Back in the days, farmers used their hands, efforts and techniques in harvesting and reaping on the field, which later being replaced mostly by tractors today.
Do the farmers lose their skills, knowledge and forgot exactly when is the right time to harvest their crops?
Absolutely not.
The same goes with AI and us today. We are the driver, and AIs are the tractor
So, will a "Vibe Coder" who has never learned syntax can be a "Senior Developer" in 2026?
My humble 'Only 10k powers in Rise of Kingdom' opinion is, Yes and No, depends on where you are employed, how you are employed, why you are employed, and how we define 'Senior Developer' in current time
If you are employed within an agency filled with non-vibecoders, maybe you won't be a Senior Developer, but you got the foundation for a junior or mid-level developer. That, if we were to speculate if company is open to more cutting edge solutions. If you are within an AI Native team or agency, then you might be able to be Senior Developer.
If you are employed within a company who's running business outside of tech needing the skills of development no matter the ways, high chance you might be gain the title if you convinced them enough. After all, businesses are all about solving problems
If you are joining startups, it'll be ultra yes. Startups aimed to scale up as soon as possible, eventhough the title don't really matter much in this phase, but you'll be moving and acting like a Senior Developer
The reason I made these comparisons because the title Senior Developer can be varied for every companies and circumstances. Though I'm open for more insightful perspectives on these
From my whole experiences, I rely the backend and database part the most on the AI, since things can get complex when you envisioned how you wanted your product to works.
While I set the structure or rough sketch on datasets and flow of the website for example, this is where AI can fully construct the whole thing as first drafts, and further reiteration after that.
But today, stronger and better models capable of even executing creative part of the gigs which is amazing. In this case, this is where we'd agree that we rely on AI for it's efficiency in getting things done.
I drew the line on the decision-making part. But that's when I'm using Opencode or Antigravity.
Nowadays while working, the creative directions can be relied on our Claude Models. Though, we still using our creative senses and directions to make sure Claude designed them in a way that fits our planning, clients' creative choices and our guidelines.
So in a simple manner, decision making is where we drew the line. We do not rely on AI to completely overtake everything. Take a pirate ship for an example. You got a captain, and crewmates. You need to be a captain, and AI models are your crewmates. You gotta know how to navigate and decide things, know your way around the sea, know the winds in the sea, knows how to read the stars to know the directions.
AI already scaled up a lot of things and we're not talking just about profits of companies. We're talking about executions, ideations, decision makings, conceptualization and researches. It has become digital agents that capable of cutting corners, saves time and helps us prioritizing planning more than executions
So, are we getting closer to being an engineer , or faster script-kiddies?
In traditional sense, we are the script-kiddies, because the Engineers code and build with their hands.
In modern sense, the terms changed.
In old times, Idols are gods or deity. Today, its also bunch of boys or girls band dancing and singing, idolized by internets
So, we might as well called ourselves engineer, if we knew inside and outside of what we are building I guess?
It's an open conclusion.
1 comment